Obama’s 2014 Budget

President Barack Obama is proposing a $3.77 trillion U.S. government budget for 2014 that would change taxes for the wealthy and adjust how Social Security benefits are calculated, a plan that fails to satisfy members of both parties.The proposal intends to reduce the deficit by nearly $2 trillion during the next decade, through a combination of new revenues and budget cuts.  It includes a minimum 30 percent tax on people making $1 million or more a year. Obama is pushing for a compromise between Republicans who refuse to raise taxes and Democrats who are seeking to protect popular programs that provide pensions and health care to the elderly and poor.

budget 2014

The president says his proposed budget is not his ideal plan to cut the deficit, but an effort at compromise to end what he says has been a cycle of short-term, crisis-driven decision-making. Competing budget plans have already been passed by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives and the Democratic-controlled Senate, setting the stage for tough negotiations.

Republicans are opposed to raising more government revenue, after a deal with Democrats earlier this year that increased income-tax rates on wealthy Americans.  And lawmakers in the president’s Democratic Party are angry over his suggestion to switch to a modified formula to measure inflation, which will lower annual cost-of-living increases for Social Security recipients.

President Obama’s Proposed 2014 Budget Overview:

  • Includes $1.8 trillion of additional budget deficit reduction over 10 years
  • Closes tax loopholes and reduces tax benefits for the wealthiest
  • Includes $400 billion in health savings
  • Includes $1 billion investment to launch manufacturing innovation institutes
  • Provides $50 billion for infrastructure investment

Thanks for reading,

Digestible Politics




2 comments on “Obama’s 2014 Budget

  1. paulbassler says:

    It is very clear that President Obama believes in a big central government. No surprise…Obama has never attempted to really hide his belief in big government, tax and spend, or in his Obama’s own word, “invest.” Obama clearly believes that he and his administration can “invest” people’s hard earned money better than the people can. Redistribute the wealth, as he said in his first campaign. Someone please show me where that has worked in the past. There is no such thing as a benevolent government. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.

  2. jmu9 says:

    Not to start an argument, but a basic principle of US governmental structure is separation of powers. The American president does not have “absolute” power in any way. As a former teacher of Civics, American Government,American History, and even law (in law school), it grieves me that a lot of people have a pretty fuzzy notion of American political reality. We could have much better political discussions if everybody could agree on some basic facts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s